Bella Bond- The Murder That Left A State Losing It’s Mind


Bella BondBella Neveah Amoroso Bond – Deer Island Jane Doe

Bella Bond was previously known as the Deer Island Jane Doe. She was an American child found dead in a plastic bag on the shore of Deer Island in Boston, Massachusetts on June 25, 2015. Authorities pursued an investigation into discovering who the child was until her identification was discovered in September of 2015.

The publicity generated many tips with possible leads, one of which led to the girl’s identity. Bella Bond was identified on September 18, 2015. Her mother, and her mother’s boyfriend, were arrested. Authorities confirmed that 2 year old Bella Bond had been murdered, despite the fact that an initial autopsy performed on the body did not uncover the exact cause of death. The investigation continued toward solving the case, and the boyfriend of the victim’s mother was eventually charged with her murder. Her mother was charged as an “accessory after the fact.”

The Body Of Little Bella Bond aka Deer Island Jane Doe

The body of Bella Bond was found inside a plastic garbage bag on the shoreline of Deer Island in Boston, Massachusetts. A woman walking her dog discovered Bella’s remains on the afternoon of June 25, 2015, when the dog stopped at the plastic bag. After the body was found, the public placed flowers near the scene. She wore only a pair of white leggings designed with a black polka-dot pattern. A zebra-print blanket was also inside the bag. Initially, police were unsure if there would be additional bodies at the scene, so they attempted, unsuccessfully, to use cadaver dogs to locate any other possible remains.

Authorities originally estimated that the girl had died within days of her discovery. Later developments in the case have suggested that Bella’s body had been “hidden in a fridge” for as long as one month before it was deposited on Deer Island. Despite the fact that she appeared to be deceased a short amount of time, she had already begun to decompose and become bloated, and so was impossible to identify visually. Decomposition had also made it impossible to collect fingerprints, due to exposure to the water. Investigators were able to conclude that she was a young child but were initially unsure of her race and ethnicity.

Where Did The Little Girl Come From

It was unknown how the remains had settled at the location. The body might either have been placed at the beach or may have drifted in the water from another location, some presuming from as far away as Canada. The United States Coast Guard entered the investigation and analyzed the currents of the water in the area to estimate where the bag containing the remains could have originated from. Dive teams were also used around the time the body was discovered.

As of mid-July and August, authorities believed the victim had been placed at the scene, rather than washing onto Deer Island from another location, because the body was not in an advanced enough stage of decomposition. The beach is near a waste-water treatment plant. One of the investigators thought there was a possibility that the disposal had been performed by an employee of the nearby water treatment plant. Since the area has been regarded as a “busy” area for both workers and the public, it was also possible that the person who placed the bag at the scene did so overnight, to avoid being seen.

A Preliminary Examination of Bella Bond

A “preliminary” autopsy was conducted on July 3rd, but did not conclude what had caused the girl’s death. However, authorities suspected foul play as a factor in the case. Yet no signs of obvious injury have been found on the remains. Tests were later conducted to find any toxins, drugs or alcohol present in the body as a possible explanation for the death. Examiners were unable to find any trace of cleaners such as bleach in the remains, but continued with more testing in hopes of finding another toxin as a possible cause of death. After the identification of the victim, a conclusive cause of death had yet to be announced, yet all forms of a “natural death had been excluded.” Suffocation was not been ruled out as the cause.

The clothing found on the toddler, believed to be a “size 4T” was determined to have been manufactured by the Circo company and was likely sold at a Target store. The blanket was possibly sold at K-Mart. A hair band made from elastic material was also found.

Determining The Age Of The Dead Little Girl

She was eventually determined to be between the ages of three and five and appeared to be white with possible Hispanic ancestry. Her hair was described as being “brown, wavy and fourteen inches in length”. It is presumed that the child’s hair was left untrimmed for approximately two years, judging by its length. It was also estimated that she was between three feet one and three feet six inches tall and weighed around thirty pounds.

There were no distinct birthmarks or scars on the body. It was later discovered that the girl had pierced ears, so the National Center for Missing & Exploited Children released an updated image of the child wearing earrings. The girl appeared to have been “well-cared for” during her life. There were no signs of malnutrition or abuse noted, and investigators stated the clothing also reinforced the theory

The child was entered into the National Missing and Unidentified Persons System on July 4, 2015, including details of the discovery of the subject and physical estimations. Many missing persons were excluded as possible identities. 

A Reconstruction Of Baby Girl Doe Was Broadcast

A press conference displaying the reconstruction and the enhanced images of the clothing and blanket was later held at the location where the body was found. It was televised to ask the public for assistance identifying the victim and to request of those that may have known her, especially her parents, to identify the girl. During the press conference, officials urged viewers to be aware of children that may have disappeared or gone uncounted for in the days leading up to the celebration of Independence Day.Despite their hopes, no one came forward to claim responsibility for the crime or to confirm who the victim was. Hundreds of tips were submitted over the phone and online and all were investigated.

When searching missing persons databases produced few cases matching her profile, authorities began to believe that the child may never have been reported missing. They explored the guess that the family of the child could be unaware of her death. Another explanation for why no matches were achieved was that she could have belonged to an “undocumented” family. Police were focused on investigating in the local community, yet they believed it possible that the girl was not from the area and continued to search through various cases of missing children.

Among The Theories

Among other theories about the case, early speculation was that the girl could have been murdered by a member of her family. A criminologist stated that it did not seem likely that she would have been “murdered by a stranger.” The fact that she had been disposed of along with personal items reinforced this theory. The fact that there were not yet any tips from relatives with information about the child supported the idea that family members were involved with the disposal of the body and possibly with her death. Investigators feared for other children who may have been in the care of those that disposed of the little girl, as they too could then be in danger. A different theory held that the child’s family members might also be deceased, having faced a similar demise.

Forensic Testing

Forensics teams analyzed the DNA of Deer Island Jane to exclude some missing persons and in hopes of matching it to possible relatives of the girl, whose DNA was on record. It was obtained through samples of hair and a tooth. The DNA did not match the profiles stored in databases of known missing persons. Officials stated that they also sent samples to the University of North Texas to create a more specific profile. Mitochondrial DNA from the bones of the child was later developed to compare to possible relatives.

Besides DNA testing, authorities conducted efforts into forensic palynology as well as isotope examination of water found at the scene. Results of the testing indicated that the child had spent time in the local, urban area, most likely in Boston, as traces of both pine and soot were found through the tests. Eventually, it was also determined that she may have spent time in “any New England” state and possibly others. The hair and enamel tests also indicated she could have “moved across the country.”

Tips  Came In 

Many leads were followed that appeared to match the circumstances of the case. A woman witnessed throwing a garbage bag over a bridge was later questioned by police, but it was found that that bag contained only spoiled fruit. Other individuals stated they had seen toddlers resembling the Jane Doe, one at a store and another at a playground, seen with a woman clothed in a “burka.” Investigators were unable to find any trace of the girl at the store through information gathered by security cameras, and the subject at the playground has yet to be located. A man stated he believed he had seen the toddler in November 2014 at a laundromat with a “heavyset” and “dirty blond” woman pushing the child in a stroller.

The local police department reported that they received many tips suggesting possible identities for the child, those of missing girls throughout the country. Many readers online told police that the girl could be Aliya Lunsford of West Virginia, who disappeared on September 24, 2011. Lunsford would have been six at the time of the discovery and did bear a resemblance to the reconstruction of the Jane Doe, but she was later excluded from the case.

Exclusions Were Made

The Massachusetts State Police later released statements on their Facebook pages regarding the exclusions of Lunsford, as well as Ayla Reynolds. Police were made aware of a possible link between the Jane Doe and Katherine Phillips, nicknamed as “Baby Kate,” who went missing in 2011. Phillips’ body has never been recovered, despite the fact that her father has since been charged with her murder and convicted of kidnapping. Authorities expressed their doubts that the body was Katherine Phillips but said they would investigate the lead. DNA between the pair was eventually compared. Phillips was later ruled out as “Baby Doe” and an announcement to the public was released on July 10.

The Identification of Bella Bond

The child was identified as Bella Neveah Amoroso Bond on September 18, 2015. The identification was made after the sister of one of Rachelle Bond’s neighbors reported to police a link between Bella Bond and the Jane Doe. Apparently, the neighbor had noticed Bella was absent from the household and had confronted Rachelle Bond and her boyfriend Michael McCarthy. They stated that the girl had been “taken away by the Department of Children and Families.”  Subsequently, the neighbor told his sister that he believed that “Baby Doe” was Bella Bond, and she then contacted authorities.

On September 17, 2015, a search warrant was executed at the home of Rachelle Bond, 40, the child’s mother, in Dorchester, Massachusetts. Since the identification was made, images of the toddler from her mother’s Facebook page have been released.

Later developments and trials
Bella Bond

pic credit – WBUR NEWS

Rachelle Bond, known as a habitual drug user, had two other children, that had been removed from her custody. She had also been arrested multiple times in the past, for other crimes, including prostitution. Police commented that they had dealt with complaints that she was neglecting her daughter and had had four separate encounters with Bond. Bella’s family was interviewed after the identification was announced. Her aunt stated that she had never suspected that “Baby Doe” was Bella, and the maternal grandmother of the victim was unaware that the child was ever born. The Department of Children and Families had responded to two neglect complaints regarding Bella Bond. Both cases were closed.

The Murder Of Bella Bond

Police released the information that the child was a murder victim and charged Michael McCarthy, the mother’s boyfriend, with Bella’s death. They also charged her mother with being an accessory to the crime, believing her to have assisted McCarthy with “covering up” Bella’s death. Larceny was added to Rachelle Bond’s charges after it was discovered that she accepted $1,400 of welfare income after she knew about the death of her daughter. The pair were arraigned on September 21, 2015. Rachelle’s bail was set for one million dollars. McCarthy was not eligible for bail. McCarthy was scheduled to appear in court again on February 16, 2016, after Rachelle Bond’s appearance on January 6th. A judge later set Rachelle Bond’s trial date to December 1, 2016.

He Said She Said

Authorities have acknowledged that since the exact cause of Bella’s death remains unknown, asserting that it was homicide to a jury could be “difficult to prove.” Rachelle Bond alleged that McCarthy had punched the toddler in the stomach multiple times after claiming that “Bella Bond was a demon” and that he was the sole perpetrator of the murder.

Prosecutors of McCarthy allege that Bella Bond was murdered in one of many abusive occasions after she had been uncooperative about going to bed. Citing that McCarthy had decided to “calm the child down,” they say Rachelle had not entered the room alongside her boyfriend. When she did enter, they say she witnessed him near the girl’s body, which was “swollen and gray,” indicating she was already dead.

Rachelle Bond’s attorney claims McCarthy threatened to murder her client if she contacted authorities. She also maintained that Rachelle was not involved with hiding the victim’s body, which had initially been placed in garbage bags and concealed in a refrigerator. A cadaver dog brought to the house later indicated that it smelled something on the refrigerator.

Bond contradicted the belief that the body was placed on Deer Island. She stated that McCarthy had placed the body in a weighted duffel bag and disposed of it in the water, suggesting it drifted to the location where it was found.

Bella Bond

Pic Credit – news.com.au

McCarthy Claimed Rachelle Was Responsible For the Death of Bella Bond

McCarthy’s lawyer objected to claims made by Rachelle Bond’s defense and stated that his client had no knowledge of Bella’s death, saying no sufficient evidence exists to indicate otherwise.They have also claimed that he had moved out of Rachelle Bond’s residence before Bella’s death.

McCarthy claimed he had left after witnessing Rachelle’s negative treatment of Bella Bond, which included emotional and physical abuse. His defense also cited that Rachelle’s statements could not be confirmed and that she was more likely to have killed her daughter because of her drug history. The claim of Bella being beaten to death was also challenged, as the autopsy did not indicate any signs of injuries consistent with what Rachelle described.

Other claims exist that accuse Rachelle Bond of fabricating the story as a way to avoid being charged with murder. It was announced that McCarthy had sent Rachelle a text message that said “don’t tell them you have a daughter. We don’t want the Department of Children and Families getting involved.”

Joe Amoroso – Biological Father of Bella Bond

Bella’s biological father, Joe Amoroso, had allegedly never met his daughter, but had spoken over a telephone with her. Amoroso had stated he had learned of Bella’s death when Rachelle told him during a visit, within a week before the identification was made. He states that he believed that Bond would not ever have hurt her daughter.

Amoroso elaborated in another interview that he believed Rachelle had been “sedated” with an injection of heroin by her boyfriend quickly after Bella’s death, as a “track mark” visible on her neck could not be the result of her own action. Unlike her son, Bella’s paternal grandmother stated that she believed Rachelle Bond was heavily involved in Bella’s death and openly questioned the truthfulness of her allegations toward Michael McCarthy.

Amoroso announced plans to bury Bella Bond in Winthrop, Massachusetts among family members, stating he had decided to have the “funeral and wake services to be public.”

Bella Bond was buried on November 28, 2015 at the Winthrop Cemetery during a private funeral, after her parents later came to a consensus not to have the service open to the public. She was buried under a headstone reading “Bella N. Bond Amoroso” with the date of death listed as the day she was discovered.

credit wikipedia

Comments

comments